Legal Opinion

Foley Whitehill v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1923No. 2754PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as ’ ahoye).

1. The appellants in their brief and in their argument urge that the petition presents a cause of action founded on an oral contract, and not upon a written contract, of employment covering a period of “at least two years” after its date, and of which oral contract the alleged letter is a sufficient “memorandum thereof in writing” to charge the appellee within the statute of frauds in this state. In this view, then, the principal question is that of whether or not the alleged letter is a sufficient “memorandum in writing” of the previously made oral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patton v. RuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Fulton v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Johnson v. GrangerTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Zanderson v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Wagniere v. DunnellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mann v. NCNB Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Conner v. Lavaca Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Easton v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Jackman v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API