Don Medow Motors, Inc. v. Grauman
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
A jury found for Alan Grauman on his claim against Don Medow Motors, Inc. (Me-dow Motors) for damages arising from the sale of a Jeep. Medow Motors raises the. following issues on appeal:
I. Was the evidence sufficient to support the jury's verdict that Medow Motors intended to defraud Grau-man as to the Jeep's correct mileage?
II. Was the evidence sufficient to support the jury's award of $3,000.00 as compensatory damages?
III. Was the evidence sufficient to support the jury's award of punitive damages?
IV. Did the trial court err in refusing to allow Medow Motors to introduce…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Hibschman Pontiac, Inc. v. BatchelorIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Center School Township v. State ex rel. Board of School CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. TrainaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lloyds of London v. LockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. CrabtreeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mayberry v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Stepp v. DuffyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.