Legal Opinion

(PC) Gutierrez v. Reyersbach

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 30, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01492Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UBALDO MIO GUTIERREZ, Case No. 2:22-CV-01492-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 13 v. (1) PROCEED ONLY WITH THE CLAIM FOUND COGNIZABLE, OR 14 P.REYERSBACH, et al., (2) DELAY SERVING ANY 15 Defendants. DEFENDANT AND FILE AN 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 ECF No. 1 18 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE 20 GRANTED 21 ECF No. 2 22 23 Plaintiff Gutierrez, a prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action under 24 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API