Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1984No. Appeals, Nos. 2417 C.D. 1982, 909 C.D. 1983 and 910 C.D. 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Anthony Brennan, Audrey P. Peterson and Renee S. Ouslander, representative claimants1 of Intermittent Intake Interviewers of the Office of Employment Security (OES), appeal from orders by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, which, granting unemployment benefits based the amount of benefits on the claimants ’ highest quarterly wages. The claimants contend that, according to Section 404(a) (1) of *232the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law,2 their unemployment benefits should be calculated instead at fifty per cent of their full-time weekly wages.

Because the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Womeldorf v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. T. Hogan Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API