Gobin v. Hancock
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Lampeón, J.
A person must be imprisoned or otherwise restrained of his personal liberty to be entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. R. L., c. 406, s. 1; Van Meter v. Sanford, 99 F. (2d) 511; 39 C. J. S. 428; 25 Am. Jur. 158. Having been granted his release from imprisonment, the right of the petitioner to the relief he seeks is now a moot question. A determination thereof by this court has therefore become unnecessary and would serve no useful purpose. In re Halley, 327 Mich. 222; State exrel. Magrum v. Nygaard, 38 N. W. (2d) 370 (1949).
Since this appeal the petitioner has filed three other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex Parte TidwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- United States ex rel. McCann v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- In Re HalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. Magrum v. NygaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dolcino v. ThalasinosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Moretti v. LangloisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
- Grote v. PowellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Woodmansee v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Maggi v. NH State Prison, WardenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.