Legal Opinion

Gobin v. Hancock

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 6, 1951No. 4004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lampeón, J.

A person must be imprisoned or otherwise restrained of his personal liberty to be entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. R. L., c. 406, s. 1; Van Meter v. Sanford, 99 F. (2d) 511; 39 C. J. S. 428; 25 Am. Jur. 158. Having been granted his release from imprisonment, the right of the petitioner to the relief he seeks is now a moot question. A determination thereof by this court has therefore become unnecessary and would serve no useful purpose. In re Halley, 327 Mich. 222; State exrel. Magrum v. Nygaard, 38 N. W. (2d) 370 (1949).

Since this appeal the petitioner has filed three other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Ex Parte TidwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. United States ex rel. McCann v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. In Re HalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State Ex Rel. Magrum v. NygaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dolcino v. ThalasinosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Moretti v. LangloisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
  3. Grote v. PowellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Woodmansee v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  5. Maggi v. NH State Prison, WardenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API