Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Bland, Judge:
I regret that I am unable to agree with the majority that the decision of the Commissioner should be reversed. I think the result he arrived at is supported by a great weight of authority.
My disagreement with the holding of the majority in reversing the decision of the Commissioner is based upon two reasons: First, the trade-marks are identical; second, it seems to me that, in view of the facts of record, confusion is likely to result.
The stipulated facts show that the trade-marks are identical; that the Bendix Aviation Corporation (hereinafter referred to as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- California Packing Corp. v. Price-Booker Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Pratt & Lambert, Inc. v. Chapman & Rodgers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial Undergarment Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.