Legal Opinion
Eisert v. Archdiocese of Santa Fe
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 2009No. 27,728PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Chief Judge.
{1} This appeal arises from summary judgment in favor of Respondents Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Our Lady of Belen Parish, and Our Lady of Belen Memorial Gardens (collectively “the cemetery”). Petitioner Ida Eisert sued the cemetery and made a number of allegations arising from the burial of her father, Juan Castillo. Eisert alleged that the cemetery breached her father’s plot reservation contract and the contract for her father’s burial, violated the Unfair Practices Act (UPA), NMSA 1978, §§ 57-12-1 to -26 (1967, as amended through 2007), and violated NMSA 1978, §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Diversey Corp. v. Chem-Source Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Salazar v. St. Vincent HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Ciup v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hauff v. PettersonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Valerio v. San Mateo Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- Encinias v. Whitener Law Firm, P.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Cates v. Mosher Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- Arnold v. DelgadilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.