Legal Opinion

Darlene Swayze v. United States of America, Stuart Martin v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1986No. 84-4375, 84-4376PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEHER, District Judge:

Darlene Swayze and Stuart Martin (appellants), both professional tax preparers, appeal from summary judgment in these consolidated actions. The IRS assessed penalties pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6694(a), charging that appellants had negligently or intentionally disregarded rules and regulations by preparing a number of so-called family trust tax returns. Appellants paid 15 percent of the assessed amounts and brought these refund actions. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of .the government, holding that appellants failed to raise any genuine issues of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Wesenberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  3. Jerome D. And Bernetta O. Hanson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Schulz v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Richard Rubin and Helene Rubin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Keith A. Berg v. Larry KincheloeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Stobie Creek Investments LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Klamath Strategic Investment Fund Ex Rel. St. Croix Ventures v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. American Boat Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Klamath Strategic Investment Fund, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API