Legal Opinion

Estate of M. Adams v. Dist. Ct. (Fallini)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2015No. 66521Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

order does not sanction petitioner's attorney, such that the attorney could challenge it personally through a writ petition. Having considered the parties' arguments, we summarily deny the writ petition, as it challenges a substantively appealable order. See NRAP 3A(b)(8) (permitting an appeal from a special order entered after final judgment, except for an order "granting a motion to set aside a default judgment under NRCP 60(b)(1) when the motion was filed and served within 60 days after entry of the default judgment"); Lindblom v. Prime Hospitality Corp., 120 Nev. 372, 374 n.1, 90 P.3d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lindblom v. Prime Hospitality Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API