Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Foreclosure Alternatives, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2010No. 2010-1495PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On June 4, 2009, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a three-count complaint with the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law against respondents, Foreclosure Alternatives, Inc. (“FAI”), Kert Alexakis, and Lance Baker, a.k.a. Lance Trester (“Trester” or “Lance”), alleging that respondents engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by soliciting homeowners who were defendants in foreclosure proceedings and offering to manage the defense of the foreclosure actions while negotiating with the lenders. FAI was the business entity engaged in the practices at issue, and Alexakis and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. TelfordOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. KolodnerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. MullaneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. WillardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Watkins Global Network, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. In re DilkIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API