United States v. Kline

While I agree with the recital of the facts contained in the majority opinion, as far as *581they go, I find them incomplete and the construction placed thereon incorrect. At the time of the incident both the appellant and the purchaser were off duty and in civilian dress. The purchaser stated that he had never been involved in a drug transaction with the appellant before the incident in-question. It is true that the purchaser testified that he and the appellant had discussed the use of drugs while in the company area, but the content of those conversations is totally unrevealed in this record.…