Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Holliday

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1888No. 13,016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

At the September term, 1885, of the court below, in an action then and there pending wherein appellee herein, Lavinia H. Holliday, was plaintiff, and James R. Stanley and others were defendants, upon a final hearing of the issues joined therein the court found, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff’s title, in and to certain described real estate in Lake county, should be quieted and forever set at rest as against defendants, as prayed for in her complaint. Afterwards, at the next ensuing November term, 1885, of such court, to wit, on the 9th day of December, 1885, the parties appeared, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. LemckeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Physio-Medical College v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Murray v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Whitman v. WellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Stanley v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. CodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Nitche v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Powers v. NesbitIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API