Legal Opinion

Finley v. Finley

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1948No. 3497Published

1Opinion

On Further Petition For Rehearing

Harvey Dickerson, of Las Vegas (Clyde D. Souter, of Reno, of counsel), for Appella'nt. Jones, Wiener & Jones and D. Francis Horsey, all of Las Vegas, for Respondent.

OPINION

2Per curiam

We heretofore affirmed the order appealed from (65 Nev. 113, 189 P.2d 334) and, without opinion, denied appellant’s motion for rehearing. Appellant has filed a second or further petition for rehearing. Such petition we decline to entertain. Trench v. Strong, 4 Nev. 87; Brandon v. West, 29 Nev. 135, 141, 85 P. 449; Ward v. Pittsburg Silver Peak Gold Min. Co., 39 Nev. 80, 148 P. 345, 153 P.…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Sweeney v. SweeneyNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Finley v. FinleyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lindsay v. LindsayNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Lauer v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API