McTamney v. Stolt Tankers & Terminals (Holdings), S.A.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Defendants Stolt-Nielsen, Inc. and Stolt Tank Containers, Inc. move for judgment on the pleadings as to count III of the complaint.
This action claims violations by defendants 1 of section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2; section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18; together with pendent state torts, Pennsylvania common law restraint of trade and interference with contractual relations. Only the Clayton Act count— count III — is challenged by defendants’ motion. Jurisdiction is federal question. 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
The complaint alleges: In January, 1986…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Columbia Pictures CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- United States v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States of America Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Southern Belle Dairy Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Fjord v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. Dairy Farmers of AmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005