Legal Opinion

Mickens v. Southland Exchange-Joint Venture

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 8, 1991No. 23430PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Southland Exchange Joint Venture (Southland) and the South Carolina Employment Security Commission (Commission) appeal a Circuit Court Order finding Douglas Mickens (Mickens) entitled to unemployment compensation.

We affirm.

FACTS

Mickens was employed as a materials handler for Southland at its Hampton, South Carolina, plant. Upon his employment, he signed a “Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement” which states, in part:

I understand that during the course of my employment with Southland Exchange Joint Venture (the “Company”), I will become privy to certain confidential…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Sandstrom v. Douglas MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Lee v. South Carolina Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. AnMed Health v. South Carolina Department of Employment & WorkforceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Mickens v. Southland Exchange-Joint VentureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Stiles v. American General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API