Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1939No. 7,901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

delivered tbe opinion of the court.

The plaintiff, accompanied by her son, a boy about twelve years old, drove her ear along Garden Avenue in the city of Butte at a point where the avenue is crossed by seven railway tracks — three of the Great Northern, two of the Butte, Anaconda & Pacific, and two of the Northern Pacific. From south to north the tracks are as follows: 1, 2 and 3, Great Northern; 4 and 5, Butte, Anaconda & Pacific; 6 and 7, Northern Pacific. From track 1 to track 6 is a distance of about 175 feet. The Great Northern maintains a “flagman’s shanty” between tracks 3 and 4. The…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. MyrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Mullery v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Graham v. RolandsonMontana Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sullivan v. DoeMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Monforton v. Northern Pacific Railway CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. O'Brien v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API