Legal Opinion
Kemp v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 29, 1941No. 903 CivilPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), in which the plaintiff claims certain sums due him on account of contracts awarded to him to supply the Post Office and War Departments with certain equipment. A stipulation entered into and filed in the case removes from controversy a good deal of what might otherwise become rather complicated accounting questions.
Plaintiff claims approximately $9,000 with interest. In addition to its denial of a major part of this indebtedness, the Government has set up counterclaims alleging that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Smyth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ackerlind v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of America, Nicholas J. Larionoff, Jr. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Wender Presses, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- United States v. Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- State of Connecticut v. FH McGraw & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.