Donahue v. Arkadelphia Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). Appellants insist that the court erred in not directing a verdict in their favor, and in directing a verdict against them, and the contention must he sustained. The bond and the obligation sued on is such a one as the statute (§§ 8287 and 8288, C. & M. Digest) applies to, and from liability upon which the sureties or guarantors may be exonerated upon compliance with its terms. Thompson v. Treller, 82 Ark. 247, 101 S. W. 174; Shores-Mueller Co. v. Palmer, 141 Ark. 64, 216 S. W. 295.
The sureties or guarantors had the right, under the statute, which is part…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boynton v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Frank v. FrankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Mayo v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Shores-Mueller Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Thompson v. TrellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madison County Farmers Ass'n v. American Employers' Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Wells v. GoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Madison County Farmers Ass'n v. American Employers' Ins.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953