Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Arkadelphia Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellants insist that the court erred in not directing a verdict in their favor, and in directing a verdict against them, and the contention must he sustained. The bond and the obligation sued on is such a one as the statute (§§ 8287 and 8288, C. & M. Digest) applies to, and from liability upon which the sureties or guarantors may be exonerated upon compliance with its terms. Thompson v. Treller, 82 Ark. 247, 101 S. W. 174; Shores-Mueller Co. v. Palmer, 141 Ark. 64, 216 S. W. 295.

The sureties or guarantors had the right, under the statute, which is part…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boynton v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Frank v. FrankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Mayo v. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Shores-Mueller Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Thompson v. TrellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madison County Farmers Ass'n v. American Employers' Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  2. Wells v. GoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Madison County Farmers Ass'n v. American Employers' Ins.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API