Boynton v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Mississippi Chancery Court; Bdwárd D. Robertson, Chancellor; 1. The bill as drawn, seeking in one respect to vacate the former decree on account of the manner in which its entry was obtained and the violation of the agreement upon which the cause was heard, and in other respects being a bill of review proper .to bring into the record the fact of the reversal of the Federal court decree, is permissible under the practice,in this State. 36 Ark. 532. The identical…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Mississippi Chancery Court; Bdwárd D. Robertson, Chancellor; 1. The bill as drawn, seeking in one respect to vacate the former decree on account of the manner in which its entry was obtained and the violation of the agreement upon which the cause was heard, and in other respects being a bill of review proper .to bring into the record the fact of the reversal of the Federal court decree, is permissible under the practice,in this State. 36 Ark. 532. The identical title in question here has already been passed upon by both Federal and State courts. 120 Fed. 819; 75 Ark. 415- 2. A…
1Opinion of the CourtHux, C. J.
The widow and. heirs at law of C. O. Boynton, deceased, in July, 1903, filed a petition for leave to file a bill of review, and tendered their bill of review. The chancellor entertained this bill, and granted a temporary injunction upon it.
After answer and development oí the evidence, a-final hearing was had, and the court dismissed the bill of review for want of equity, and the plaintiffs therein have appealed.
Questions of fact, professional ethics and equity jurisprudence have been presented in the briefs and at the bar. While many of these questions will not be noticed in the opinion, they…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Butler v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boynton v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Ransom v. City of PierreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Boynton v. HaggartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Brown v. BocquinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- John Cheeseman Trucking, Inc. v. PinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- DeSota Coal Min. & Dev. Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Davis v. HaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Frank v. FrankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.