Legal Opinion

Receiver v. Cook

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1894No. 123PublishedCited by 67 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for First District, in an appeal from Anderson County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

J. M. Cook sued T. M. Campbell, then receiver of the International & Great Northern Railroad Company, alleging that on the lOthdayof November, 1891, plaintiff was in the employ of the said receiver as a brakeman; that it was a part of his duty to uncouple .and couple cars, and to remove coupling pins when necessary for that purpose. That I. McNeill was also in the employ of the receiver as conductor of the train on which plaintiff was working, and that said McNeill had the control and direction of the plaintiff and the said crew, whose duty it was to obey his orders.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Pacific Express Co. v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. T. & P. R'y Co. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Dowell v. WintersTexas Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. Standard Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Hall v. Manufacturers Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Peirce v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  5. Auto Transit Co. v. City of Ft. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API