Legal Opinion
United States v. Premises & Real Property at 297 Hawley Street
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 4, 1990No. CIV-89-1029TPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TELESCA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff United States commenced this action for civil forfeiture against the premises and real property at 297 Hawley Street under 21 U.S.C. § 881. The Government now moves for a stay of this forfeiture action pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(i) until the disposition of related criminal matters pending against claimant Roberta Sturgis, or for a protective order pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 26(c)(1) directing that discovery not be had until disposition of the related criminal matters. For the reasons discussed below, the Government’s motion for a stay is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. U. S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. $152,160.00 United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CunanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Talco Contractors, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1994
- United States v. Leasehold Interests in 118 Avenue D, Apartment 2ADistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- United States v. All Funds Deposited in Account No. 200008524845District Court, D. Wyoming · 2001
- Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.