Legal Opinion

Phoenix Mining & Milling Co. v. Scott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1898No. 2878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County.—Hon. John B. Davidson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This cause was tried and submitted to the superior court of Kittitas county upon an agreed statement of facts, and from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor the defendants appealed. It appears from the agreed statement that appellant is sheriff in Kittitas county, and that in Uovember, 1894, appellant Scott recovered a judgment in the superior court against John A. Shoudy, in an action upon a promissory note executed by said Shoudy as surety for one Graff. It is further stipulated that “said judgment is not a legal claim or demand against the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Manuel v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Black v. Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Karnes v. FlintWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Perez v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Searle v. BirdWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wiesenthal v. Abe GoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API