Legal Opinion

Perez v. Perez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 13, 1974No. 822-3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

Plaintiff instituted a declaratory judgment action seeking a share of a lump-sum payment defendant received as a settlement under the Federal Employers Liability Act. The injury, for which the settlement was accorded, took place during the marriage of the parties and while he was an employee of the railroad. The settlement, received after the parties were divorced, was not before the court in the divorce action. The trial court found the settlement to have been community property, and after deducting expenses, awarded one-half of the net figure to the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rhodes v. GouldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. In Re the Marriage of KittlesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. In Re the Marriage of ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Davidson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API