Legal Opinion

State v. Olivas

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 8, 1969No. 2 CA-CR 172PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

The two appellants and another were jointly tried and found guilty of first degree burglary. There was testimony at the trial that two of the codefendants (including one of the appellants) made incriminating statements after arrest, and the most important question raised is whether the other codefendant-appellant against whom no such testimony was offered was entitled to a separate trial under the principles of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968).

The basic facts are as follows. At about 1:40 a. m., on the morning of April 18, 1968,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TresizeArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. MiguelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. State v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API