Legal Opinion

State v. Miguel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 15, 1971No. 1 CA-CR 242PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

Appellant, Edwin Miguel, and one Perkins Scott were charged by separate informations with burglary, first degree, and grand theft. For reasons not here pertinent, the Maricopa County Public Defender, attorney for both defendants, moved to consolidate their cases for trial. The motion was granted, and the trials consolidated. After a jury trial, appellant Miguel was convicted of burglary, first degree, and petty theft, receiving a sentence of not less than five years nor more than ten years on the burglary conviction.

On appeal from this conviction and sentence, Miguel raises…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. PedersonArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Murphy v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. PickardArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KorovkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. State v. QuatslingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. State v. DensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Sullivan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API