Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lahti v. Fosterling

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1959No. Docket 21, Calendar 47,766Published

1DissentCarr, J.

Plaintiff instituted this proceeding under the provisions of the workmen’s-compensation law of the State.* The question at issue is whether an employee suffering a compensable injury arising out of and in the course of his employment is subject, as to medical and hospital expenses, to the provision of the statute in effect at the time of such disability. The facts are not in dispute, and in submitting the case to the referee,, counsel entered into a stipulation relating thereto' in lieu of proofs.

It appears that on October 4, 1954, defendant employer was subject to the provisions of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Tarnow v. Railway Express AgencyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Munson v. ChristieMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bruso's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Michigan Boiler & Sheet Iron Works Ex Rel. American Mutual Liability Co. v. DresslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API