Legal Opinion

Fenn v. Noah

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2006No. 31433PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

This case arises out of the purchase of real property in Cambridge, Idaho. Appellant Philip Fenn (Fenn) purchased five acres of land once owned by Respondents Randy and Kathryn Noah (the Noahs) by assuming a land sale contract between the Noahs and Fenn’s predecessor in interest, Glenn N. Kline (Kline). Fenn brought suit against the Noahs for allegedly violating the Idaho Consumer Protection Act, constructive fraud, and breach of contract. These claims arise from a survey performed for the Noahs which revealed that the legal description of the property did not match the fence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity Ex Rel. Eikum v. Idaho State Board of Education Ex Rel. MossmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ameritel Inns, Inc. v. Greater Boise Auditorium DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Trilogy Network Systems, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gaylen Clayson v. Don ZebeIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Frantz v. OsbornIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Houpt v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Stevenson v. Windermere Real Estate/Capital Group, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API