Legal Opinion

Branning v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 1, 1981No. 400-76PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before the court on exceptions to the report of Trial Judge Francis C. Browne.

After consideration of the briefs and oral argument of the parties, we adopt the report, as modified, as an opinion of this court. Because we find it unnecessary to reach the issue of whether there was a "sonic” easement, we delete that portion of the report discussing the issue. Additionally, we delete that portion of the report dealing with rights of third-party plaintiffs; thus, who shares in the award shall be determined at the time of the final judgment.

*242The novelty of this decision is in its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Air Pegasus of d.c., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Samaad v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Armijo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API