Legal Opinion

C. M. Clark Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Reed

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 7, 1975No. Civ. A. 71-H-391, 71-H-392PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs are seeking compensatory and punitive damages stemming from the suspension of business activity of Safeguard Insurance Company in April, 1967, by the Pennsylvania Insurance Department. Plaintiffs are Safeguard Mutual Insurance Company and C. M. Clark Insurance Agency, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation organized by persons interested in the welfare of Safeguard Mutual Insurance Company. The defendant is George F. Reed, who was at all times material to this suit chief counsel of the Insurance Department or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Clark v. LutcherDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Brewer v. HillDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1978
  5. Opinion No. Oag 10-86, (1986), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API