Legal Opinion

Spearman Corporation Marysville Division v. The Boeing Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 18, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00013Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 SPEARMAN CORPORATION Case No. C20-13RSM 10 MARYSVILLE DIVISION and SPEARMAN 11 CORPORATION KENT DIVISION, ORDER GRANTING IN PART BOEING’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 THE BOEING COMPANY, 15 16 Defendant. 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 This case comes before the Court on Defendant Boeing’s Motion for Summary 19 Judgment. Dkt #137. Plaintiffs Spearman Corporation and Spearman Corporation Kent 20 Division (“Spearman”) oppose. Dkt. #166. The Court has determined that it can rule without 21 22…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API