Legal Opinion

Mayberry v. General Orthopedics, PC

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2005No. Docket No. 126136PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

We are presented with the question whether a second notice of intent to sue for medical malpractice tolls the period of limitations when an earlier notice was sent with more than 182 days remaining in the limitations period. We hold that it does. In Omelenchuk v City of Warren,1 we held that a notice of intent to sue for medical malpractice, filed with fewer than 182 days remaining in the limitations period, *3initiates the 182-day tolling period of MCL 600.5856(d).2 This case takes the next step, asking whether a plaintiff, who filed a notice of intent to sue sufficiently early in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Burton v. Reed City Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Omelenchuk v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. LawMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ashby v. ByrnesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brackett v. Focus Hope, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Clohset v. No Name Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hoffman v. BoonsiriMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Young v. NandiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API