Legal Opinion

Illinois National Insurance Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 28, 1998No. 96-1713PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This is a dispute between two insurers concerning their respective responsibilities under competing “other insurance” clauses. The trial court declined to prorate their responsibilities on the basis of the combined policy limits, but rather applied the “closer to the risk” test used by the Minnesota courts. Because we are not persuaded to subscribe to the Minnesota doctrine, we reverse and remand.

Larry Boughn was injured in a fall from a pickup truck owned by Steven Crozier and operated by Steven’s brother, Gary Crozier. The accident occurred on Gary’s farm. Steven, as owner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. HoltySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. Kalell v. Mutual Fire & Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Union Insurance Co. v. Iowa Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Hernandez v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Sager v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Westfield Insurance Companies v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. National Surety Corporation v. Ranger Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Peerless Insurance v. Vermont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API