Legal Opinion
United States v. Gregory Surratt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1996No. 94-4117PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court following the defendant’s guilty plea to a charge of knowingly receiving through the mails visual depictions involving the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) (1988 & Supp. V 1993). Our principal concern is with the government’s contention that the district court erred by not increasing the base offense level by five levels on the basis of a listed specific offense characteristic — “a pattern of activity involving the sexual abuse or exploitation of a minor.”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Cross (90-3421) v. Robert A. Williams, (90-3239), Althea Anderson, (90-3305), Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William M. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Edward Lee MahaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Steven Lynn GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Geoffrey Richard RughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. John Van Shutters, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David Harper (99-6485) and Juan Garcia (99-6543)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Loren Samuel WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. ErpenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. James Allen Hibbler, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.