Legal Opinion

Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1921No. Nos. 22,144, 22,274, 22,275, 22,276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

After the appeal reported in 145 Minn. 395, 177- N. W. 635, the matter of receiver’s compensation and that of attorney’s fees were submitted to Dickinson and Jelly, JJ., and fixed by them. From orders appointing a receiver, directing a sale of the property, allowing the receiver’s final account, fixing his fees and those of his attorney, and refusing to vacate the order for the sale of the property and allowing the receiver’s claim, intervener Melin- appealed.

1Per curiam

The intervener appeals from four separate orders made at different times by the -district court of Hennepin county. The appeals are: (1) From an order appointing the receiver; (2) from an order directing a sale of the property in question; (3) from an order allowing the receiver’s final account and fixing his fees and those of his attorney, and (4) from an order refusing to vacate the order for the sale of the property and allowing the receiver’s claim.

The matters embraced in the first two appeals referred to were fully considered and finally disposed of in 145 Minn. 395, 177 N. W. 635. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northland Pine Co. v. Northern Insulating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Olson v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. In re State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Barnard Cope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Village of Zumbrota v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. In Re Receivership of Hill Furniture CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API