State v. Malusky
North Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBuee, J.
I adopt the principles set forth in the syllabus and concur in the conclusion reached by Judge Nuessle though not with all of the reasoning.
The crime to which the defendant pleaded guilty on May 28, 1928, is a' felony under our statute. Petitioner admits that under the name of Joe Holoski he was convicted of grand larceny in 1914 in Wisconsin and sentenced to serve a term of one year in the Wisconsin state reformatory; and that in the year 1911 in St. Louis county, Minnesota, undeT the same name he was convicted of perjury and sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the Minnesota State…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- O'CONNELL v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- In re CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ex Parte MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.