People v. Kindell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentAndrias, J.
The majority holds that the existing, unexpanded record is sufficient to establish that defendant received ineffective assistance when his trial counsel failed to move to reopen the suppression hearing based on trial testimony. However, on the record before us, this Court should not abandon the long established principle of requiring, except in rare cases, a CPL 440.10 motion to explore defense counsel’s reasoning when a defendant raises an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that involves matters that are not fully explained by the record, including matters of strategy (see generally…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.