Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Strock

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1936No. 5 Div. 7PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

A statement of the facts necessary to a decision of this case is as follows: A suit in assumpsit was filed by J. Z. Mims against Dr. C. S. Strock. On March 4, 1935, a judgment was entered in -favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the circuit court for $100 and costs of suit, said judgment being entered “by consent.” This amount was paid into the court by the defendant in satisfaction of the judgment. On April 2, 1935, the plaintiff, in person, filed a motion for a new trial in the cause and called the same to the attention of the judge of the circuit- court, who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. McCarver v. Doe ex dem. HerzbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Chilton v. GurganusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Cullman City Board of Education v. BuchanonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1969
  3. Ex Parte C. S. StrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API