Legal Opinion

Clarence Jones v. Richard Alfred

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 30, 2009No. 09-40256UnpublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: *

Clarence Jones, a state prisoner, appeals a summary judgment in favor of the defendant prison officials on his claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asserts that he was denied the right to attend Muslim religious services while on cell restriction. The defendants do not deny the assertion but say that prisoners on cell restriction were not allowed to attend religious services, pursuant to a prison policy (AD-03.70) that has since been changed. We affirm.

We review a summary judgment de novo.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Sossamon v. Lone Star State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Siglar v. HightowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Mayfield v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Slocum v. DevezinDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
  2. Amy Elizabeth Terry v. Orleans Parish Justice Center, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
  3. Bodden v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
  4. Bohemond v. City of Dallas TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
  5. Boudreaux v. PrevostDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API