Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Tesla, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 12, 2022No. 3:17-cv-06748Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OWEN DIAZ, Case No. 3:17-cv-06748-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING NEW TRIAL ON 9 v. LIABILITY 10 TESLA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 359 Defendants. 11 12 13 After a jury verdict assigning Tesla liability and awarding plaintiff Owen Diaz 14 compensatory and punitive damages, and after I denied Tesla’s motion for a new trial on liability 15 and damages, it moves again for a new trial on liability and damages. But I already decided this 16 question. There appears to be no reason—aside from strategic gamesmanship—that Tesla…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API