Otis v. Kolsky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
Five actions were brought against the defendant, growing out of an automobile collision at the intersection of Washington Lane and Greene Street, in Germantown. One of the plaintiffs, Keating, owned one of the automobiles but was not riding therein. There were four persons in his car. Two of them, Lautenschlager and Jones, were employees of Keating and were engaged in his service at the time of the collision. Otis went with them on the trip, from which they were returning, to show them the road, and his wife, the fourth member of the party, was a guest at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Moses v. Northwestern Pennsylvania Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Kirschbaum v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Griffiths v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rhodes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Campagna v. LylesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Tolomeo v. Harmony Short Line Motor Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Torrens Et Ux. v. BelfattoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Sharpe v. Phila. R. T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.