Legal Opinion

Campagna v. Lyles

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1929No. Appeal, 182PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Michael Campagna, an employee of one Ziskind, was injured in a collision at the intersection of Market and 11th Streets in the Borough of McKeesport. The latter, with plaintiff on the front seat beside him, was driving a Ford car south on the first named highway, and, according to his evidence, signalled about 25 feet before reaching the point of crossing. His testimony indicated that his speed was not more than ten to fifteen miles an hour, and, further, that defendant’s machine was first seep by him when only 8 or 10 feet away, approaching at right angles from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Campagna v. ZiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Hill v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Dunlap v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Johnson v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Paperry v. RybackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Beam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API