Legal Opinion

United States v. Neman Brothers & Associates

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 8, 1991No. 89-07-00444PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MUSGRAVE, Judge.

I. Introduction

This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants (“Neman Brothers” or “Neman”) claim that the case should be time barred by 19 U.S.C. § 1621 because they never received acknowledgement of their proposed waiver of the statute. In the alternative, defendants argue that the government's claim should be barred because the case was filed one year and one day after the proposed waiver period.

The government claims that the waiver was executed and returned, and copies of the waiver and a transmittal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Warrior Tombigbee Transportation Company, Inc. v. M/v Nan Fung Etc., John K. Irish, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Mitsui Foods, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Elmer L. Caylor v. C. Edgar VirdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  4. Gregory Lawson v. Conyers Chrysler, Plymouth, and Dodge Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. H. Barry Ressler and Oscar M. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
  2. United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2003
  4. United States v. Inn Foods, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2003
  5. United States v. GuldmanUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API