Legal Opinion

Kane v. Nakamoto

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1920No. 16097PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Holden, J., entered June 19, 1920, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover for personal injuries and damages to an automobile. After the issues were framed, the cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in the sum of $1,727.50. Within the time required by law, the defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and subsequently made a motion for a new trial. These motions were both overruled by the trial court and a judgment entered upon the verdict. The defendant appeals.

On August 22, 1909, at the intersection of East Union street, Twelfth avenue and Madison streets, in the city of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gallamore v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Johnson v. CaughrenWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ongaro v. TwohyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Meehan v. HesselgraveWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Burns v. DillsWashington Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API