Legal Opinion
Hatter v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 22, 1994No. 705-89 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
This opinion addresses plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment filed September 2, 1993 and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment filed October 1, 1993. Oral argument was heard on November 16, 1993. The parties agree that there are no material disputed facts. We conclude that defendant’s cross-motion should be granted.
I
Plaintiffs are federal district and circuit court judges who took office prior to January 1, 1983. On that date, all federal judges for the first time became subject to the Hospital Insurance (Medicare) portion of the Social Security tax.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Evans v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. HatterSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hatter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Hatter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Hatter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Swisher International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.