Legal Opinion
Ellenburg v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1964PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer
The defendant-appellant, Guy Ellenburg, appeals from a conviction of possessing obscene literature in violation of Section 39-3001, T.C.A. The pertinent part of this statute- reads as follows:
“If any person print, publish, import, sell or distribute any book, pamphlet, ballad, printed paper or film containing obscene language or obscene prints, pictures, or descriptions, manifestly tending to corrupt the morals, or introduce the same into any family, school, or place of education, or have the same in his possession for the purpose of loan, sale, exhibition, or circulation, or with intent to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Railroad v. CriderTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BoboTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Key v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.