Legal Opinion

Reinking v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals of Marion County

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1996No. 49A04-9512-CV-462PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Petitioners-Appellants, Allen and Ola Reinking (collectively, "the Reinkings"), appeal the trial court's order which upheld the decision of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals ("MBZA" or "the Board"), to deny their Petition for Variance. We affirm.

Issues

The Reinkings present two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

I. Whether a subsequent purchaser of property may, successfully raise the prior owner's issue of taking without just compensation in violation of See.21, Article I of the Indiana Constitution and the due process clause of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bd. of Zoning Ap. of Decatur v. Decatur, Ind. Co. of Jehovah's WitnessesIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Boffo v. Boone County Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Metro. Board of Zoning Appeals v. Standard Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Town of Beverly Shores v. BagnallIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re Marriage of SnemisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Chosnek v. RolleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Richard Roeser Professional Builder, Inc. v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Town of Georgetown v. SewellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Cyr v. J. Yoder, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API