Legal Opinion
Town of Georgetown v. Sewell
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 2003No. 22A04-0206-CV-289PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Judge.
The Town of Georgetown ("Georgetown") appeals the judgment of the trial court, which found that Georgetown com mitted a taking against Randy and Denise Sewell (collectively, "the Sewells") and James Timothy Sewell ("Timothy"). Georgetown raises several issues, which we consolidate and restate as:
I. Whether the trial court erred by granting Timothy's motion to amend the complaint to add the Sewells as party plaintiffs; and
II. Whether the trial court erred by finding that a taking had occurred with respect to tract one of the. subject property.
We reverse.
The relevant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wanda Goodpaster v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Old Romney Development Co. v. Tippecanoe CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Reagan v. County of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sloan v. Town Council of the Town of PatokaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Greenfield Mills Inc v. Macklin, LarryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.