Legal Opinion

Metz v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 20, 1972No. 298, September Term, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

As a result of an action in tort brought by appellant-employee in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to his own use and to the use of Fireman’s Fund American Insurance Company (Fireman’s Fund), the jury returned a judgment in his favor for the sum of $30,000 and a separate judgment in his favor to the use of Fireman’s Fund for the sum of $4,465. The latter judgment represented sums paid to appellant-employee by Fireman’s Fund upon his application for workmen’s compensation payments to cover injuries he received in a motor vehicle accident involving the defendant below.

The defendant below…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore Transit Co. v. HarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Oleszczuk v. Calmar Steamship Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
  3. Barrett v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  4. McCally v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  5. Stark v. GrippCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Podgurski v. OneBeacon InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Collins v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Hubbard v. Livingston Fire Protection, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Cooper v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API