Baltimore Transit Co. v. Harroll

We are called upon to determine the true relationship between an agreement by an employer to furnish medical care to injured or sick employees and certain provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Baltimore Transit Company and the union representing its employees entered into a collective bargaining agreement. Article 17 of the agree ment provided inter alia that the company would furnish the services of physicians and surgeons if an employee elected to avail himself of them, and if an employee resided where company doctors did not practice, the company would pay a stipulated fee to…