Legal Opinion
Kistler v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 3, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00966Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JAMES KISTLER and LISA LANG, Plaintiffs, No. 3:22-cv-966 (SRU) v. STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs James Kistler and Lisa Lang bring this action on behalf a potential class of participants and beneficiaries of a retirement plan, the Stanley Black & Decker Retirement Account Plan (“Plan”). Doc. No. 85 at ¶ 1. The plaintiffs claim that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“Stanley Black & Decker”) breached its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.